How ISBSG Data Supports Output-Based Contracting
In the context of Agile application development, input-based Time & Materials (T&M) contracts are considered to be an industry “bad practice”. Payment for work is based upon the effort spent, rather than value delivered, potentially ignoring improvements in delivery speed and productivity. To overcome this issue, organizations are increasingly looking towards output-based contracting models that utilize objective, standardized metrics. By leveraging industry-recognized data from the ISBSG alongside frameworks such as the Dutch practice guideline NPR 5333 (output-based measurement, performance management and contracting), and Easy Functional Sizing (EFS), stakeholders can establish a “win-win” model based on transparency, fair risk-sharing, and clear, data-driven performance management.
